HENRI MATISSE - Tête de femme
HENRI MATISSE (1869-1954)
Tête de femme
signed ‘Henri Matisse’ (upper left)
oil on canvasboard
13¾ x 10¬ in. (34.9 x 27 cm.)
Painted in 1919
With its vigorous brushwork and soft
tonalities, Tête de femme demonstrates
a distinct stylistic change in Henri
Matisse’s art at the end of the First
World War. Painted during the winter of
1918-19, the present work leaves behind
the sombre colours and highly angular
style the artist had adopted during the
war years in Paris and demonstrates his
return to a more traditionally fgurative
mode of representation, inspired by the
naturalism of artists such as Ingres,
Courbet and Renoir. Focusing principally
on the female fgure during this period,
the artist employed several professional
models to sit for him in the improvised
studio he established in his hotel in
Nice. Tête de femme focuses on one
such professional model, and represents
Matisse’s growing interest in the portrait
as a vehicle for artistic experimentation.
Faced with the prospect of another cold
and dismal winter in wartime Paris,
Matisse had decided to escape to the
Côte d’Azur for a few months towards
the end of 1917, arriving in Nice on 20
December in what was to become the
frst of a series of annual trips to the area.
His time in the South of France had a
signifcant impact on his art, with the
difused winter light of the Mediterranean
sparking a new creative energy in his
work. Living an almost hermitic lifestyle
devoid of distraction, Matisse used the
sojourn to devote himself entirely to
his art, spending large portions of his
day absorbed in painting and drawing
sessions. Perhaps most signifcantly
though, the move resulted in an extended
period of separation from the artist’s
family each year, which deprived him of
his regular models - his wife Amélie, and daughter Marguerite
- and forced him to hire local professionals in their place.
Although there was a shortage of young women willing to act
as artist’s models in Nice at the time, Matisse used his contacts
at the city’s school of art to source several suitable girls to sit
for him, and began to use these women as a medium through
which he could experiment with the representation of the
human fgure. Matisse later acknowledged their importance in
his art, saying: ‘My models are not simply extras on stage. They
are the principle theme of my work. I totally depend on them…’
(Matisse, quoted in T. Llorens, ‘Intimacy and Ornament’, in
Matisse 1917-1941, exh. cat., Madrid, 2009, p. 208).
In this striking portrait Matisse focuses solely on the head and
shoulders of his model, capturing her from a slightly elevated
angle and allowing her visage to dominate the composition.
Her unfinching gaze holds the viewer’s attention and imbues
the painting with a sense of intimacy that belies the sitter’s
anonymous status. The artist had previously worked with the
same models repeatedly over an extended period of time,
depicting them in a variety of diferent costumes, poses and
attitudes to achieve an array of unique compositions. However,
the woman depicted in Tête de femme appears in only a
handful of Matisse’s paintings and drawings, all captured over
the winter of 1918-19. As a result of this brief partnership,
her identity remains a mystery to us, although it has been
suggested that she was the sister of Matisse’s principal model
during the following years, Antoinette Arnoud, with the two
sharing a strong physical likeness.
However, representing the identity of the sitter in Tête de
femme was not of central importance to Matisse. Rather, the
artist wished to use his model as a conduit for experimentation,
allowing him to investigate form and colour in the human
fgure without the need to slavishly reproduce an exact
physical likeness. Using a professional model freed the artist
from the formal constraints of a traditional commissioned
portrait, as well as the emotional attachment which drove his
representations of his wife and daughter. In Tête de femme
Matisse focuses on the modelling of the woman’s fgure,
capturing a sense of weight and three-dimensionality in her
form. Writing to his wife from Nice, he described the new
importance of mass in his approach, explaining: ‘I look for the
density in things. Instead of reducing what I see to an outline,
I try to express volume and modelling’ (Matisse, quoted in H.
Spurling, Matisse: The Master, vol. II, London, 2005, p. 238).
The painting also demonstrates Matisse’s adoption of an
increasingly nuanced chromatic vocabulary in his art, inspired
by the spectrum of colours he encountered in Nice. Using
varying shades of pure colour, the artist captures the play of
light on his model’s skin in a subtle modulation of diferent
tones, built through a complex layering of paint.
Matisse’s renewed approach to modelling and colour, so
evident in the present work, was a result of the artist’s growing
dissatisfaction with abstraction during the war years. Fearing
his art was becoming derivative and lifeless in its pursuit of
the abstract, the artist turned to a more classically descriptive
approach to painting, as a means of avoiding what he called
‘the drying up efect of pure abstraction’ (Matisse, quoted
in ibid., p. 222). Speaking to the Scandinavian art historian
Ragnar Hoppe in 1919, Matisse declared: ‘When you have
achieved what you want in a certain area, you must, when the
time comes, change course, search for something new… If I
had continued down the other road, which I knew so well, I
would have ended up as a mannerist. One must always keep
one’s eye, one’s feeling, fresh…’ (Matisse, quoted in J. Flam,
Matisse on Art, London, 1995, p. 75).
Comments
Post a Comment